Tag: Paradox

My son-in-law, Paz, sent me an email in which he mentioned autological words and heterological words. This was not a concept I was familiar with, so thank you, Paz, for extending my education.

It’s an interesting topic for anyone interested in words, so if that’s you – read on!

Paz provided some examples: ‘word’, ‘English’, ‘pentasyllabic’ and ‘writable’ are autological; ‘palindrome’, ‘non-hyphenated’ and ‘long’ are heterological.

Can you work out what’s going on here? I could not at first.

‘Word’ is a word, ‘English’ is written in English, ‘pentasyllabic’ has five syllables, and ‘writable’ is capable of being written.

‘Palindrome’ is not palindromic, ‘non-hyphenated’ is not free of hyphens, and ‘long’ is not a long word.

And that’s what the terms mean. Autological words fit their own meaning, heterological words don’t!

This, of course, got me thinking. Is ‘autological’ itself autological or heterological? Clearly, I thought, it must be autological – an example of its own meaning. But what about ‘heterological’? This is known as the Grelling-Nelson Paradox.

See also:

Grelling-Nelson paradox – Wikipedia

Useful? Interesting?

If you enjoyed this or found it useful, please like, comment, and share below. (If you don’t see those links, click the article’s title above the main photo and they will appear.) Send a link to friends who might enjoy the article or benefit from it – Thanks! My material is free to reuse (see conditions), but a coffee is always welcome and encourages me to write more often!